Frederick Vanbrabant's Delirious Rantings

Home /

Communication for team leaders - Trust

People , Communication for team leaders

The second part of a three-part"Communication for Team Leaders". This one is about trust, letting go and delegating. I think it’s the hardest one for new managers. You can find the first post here: https://frederickvanbrabant.com/blog/2024-10-11-communication-for-team-leaders-context/ These posts are based on a part of my talk, “I just became a team lead, now what” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWtSbTded0o).

Communication for team leaders - Context

People , Communication for team leaders

This will be the first post in a series of three called “Communication for Team Leaders”. The first focuses on context and why it’s crucial in daily communication and task-giving. These posts are based on a part of my talk, “I just became a team lead, now what” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWtSbTded0o). You can have a fantastic team of subject matter experts and brilliant technical people, but if they don’t talk to each other, you will never get a good product or outcome for a project. I don’t think this is a new statement. Soft skills have been a focus of conference talks for a while now. We keep talking about empathy and how we bring messages, yet I haven’t seen a lot of practicality in those talks, and as a result, the adoption in companies is fairly low. I hope I can bring some practicality to this topic with these posts.

Data driven is not the silver bullet you think it is

Strategy

In the 2010s, there was a huge buzz around big data. Big data was going to save the world of decision-making. Gather all the information you can about the market, clients, employees, and your product, and just follow where the data will lead you. The big data buzzword went away a bit (I guess we now use it to fuel the AI buzz), but the mindset remained. These days, we call it data-driven, and it’s used every day in management meetings. It’s a great way to give power to your strategy, and the data doesn’t lie…

I think we should reimagine how we see architecture principles

Enterprise architecture , Software , Managing technology

To me, it always seems strange that in a world that thrives on innovation and constant change, every architectural department tries to implement a rigid set of principles that stay in place for years. From software design patterns (think SOLID, DRY, …) to the more strategic layer (think TOGAF, PRINCE2, …), these principles seem to have been around forever. Is anything really timeless and forever the same?

Internal vs consulting Enterprise Architecture

Enterprise architecture , Consulting

Today, I want to discuss the two big experiences you can have as an Enterprise Architect: working internally at a company and being a consultant. I’ve done both in the past, so I hope to bring some insights into this topic. I have the feeling that depending on what you have more experience with (internal or consulting), you will have a very different perspective on Enterprise architecture as a whole.

Architecture in an agile world

Enterprise architecture , Software

Before we start talking about architecture, it’s a good idea to lay out the foundation of this discussion first. I know there are a million articles about agile and how it will all save us from certain doom and is a money-making machine, but let’s stop the marketing drive for a second and have an honest look at it.

Business Capabilities, how I like to use them

Enterprise architecture , Capabilities

So we should probably start with this right? Business capabilities (further in this article referred to as capabilities) are the backbone of enterprise architecture. They are also, sadly, one of the most misunderstood things in enterprise architecture. You can think of a capability as something a company can, or is doing. An example here could be, if you are a restaurant, stock management or food preparation.

Software , Managing technology

Picture this: it’s a Tuesday afternoon. You are called into a meeting room by your teamlead. He’s conversing with a client about a big new project they want to develop. After a bit of an introduction about the scope and features of the project, a very unrealistic deadline is proposed. Not only that, but you know from the past that this client has the reputation of having a very limited budget, so the amount of people that would work on the project would be a skeleton crew.

The economics of clean code

Software , Managing technology

“The only way to make the deadline — the only way to go fast — is to keep the code as clean as possible at all times.” — Robert C. Martin I’m afraid I have to disagree with this statement. Let me tell you why. What is clean code There seem to be many opinions surrounding clean code. Some people have an entire architecture of how code should look. Others stick to the actual layout of the code, or length of a class while even others vaguely point towards Robert C. Martin’s books.

What is a binary tree and why would I ever want to reverse it

Software

You have probably already heard the horror stories of code interviews where they ask you to reverse a binary tree on a whiteboard. (if not check this blog post that I profoundly disagree with) Well, a few days ago I was in that exact situation. And I had no idea what the interviewer was talking about. So what are these binary trees and why is it so critical that you know how to inverse them? Let’s find out.